Jesus the libertarian?

Jesus has been enlisted, yet again, into the service of a political philosophy. This time, according to former Bushie Michael Gerson, it’s Senator Tom Coburn’s alleged claim that Jesus was a libertarian.

Gerson’s piece is a rambling paean to the virtues of “compassionate conservatism,” one of George Bush’s signatures from the beginning. In theory, this sort of conservatism is just another way of restating that the state must step in to help those in need when such needs can not be met privately.

To which I agree in principle. In practice, the Bush administration has shown little restraint in its so-called compassion, spending monies that the government should not on politically expedient causes such as more benefits for the wealthiest segment of our society: seniors (the Medicare expansion).

Then there’s the stupidity of the No Child Left Behind act. Yes, George, all of our children here in Lake Wobegon, a/k/a the United States, are above average. Then there’s the notion that the government must bail out the stupids: folks who fell for mortgages they should have known would baloon; folks who knowingly “bought” houses they could not afford, all with the tacit approval and encouragement of a “compassionate” administration; folks in poverty and on welfare for five or more generations in New Orleans, suddenly expected to drive out of town in vehicles they did not own, then being coddled, with the Feds taking over as the welfare state in lieu of the city or state of Louisiana.

None of this is conservatism, and, in the real world, not compassionate, since it rewards individual failure. Thereby assuring such failure will happen again. And again.

As for Jesus’ role in any of this, it is not apparent. Jesus did tell us to care for those most in need. Jesus did not mention word one about any government doing so. The basics are in Matthew 22:36-40, but how we are to love our neighbor as ourselves is left to how we interpret the rest of Scripture.

Michael Gerson cites some Old Testament, and he’s not wrong. On the other hand, neither is Tom Coburn wrong when he cites Jesus’ parable about the rich man selling all his possessions. Coburn, as quoted by Gerson:

“show that true giving and compassion require sacrifice by the giver. This is why Jesus told the rich young ruler to sell his possessions, not his neighbor’s possessions. Spending other people’s money is not compassionate.”

Tom Coburn is exactly right. Spending someone else’s money isn’t compassion. It’s government. And government may accomplish good things; necessary things. But private monies, motivated by compassion, are much more likely to find their target.

It’s misappropriation by the government.

Advertisements

One comment

  1. “It’s misappropriation by the government.”

    You are being way to kind to the government and those who push government redistribution of wealth. I would characterize it as THEFT, not misappropriation. One can get a feel for this government “compassion” mentality touted by liberals and socialists like Obama and Clinton from this account from John 12:3-8.

    3 Mary therefore took a pound of expensive ointment made from pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped his feet with her hair. The house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. 4 But Judas Iscariot, one of his disciples (he who was about to betray him), said, 5 “Why was this ointment not sold for three hundred denarii and given to the poor?” 6 He said this, not because he cared about the poor, but because he was a thief, and having charge of the moneybag he used to help himself to what was put into it. 7 Jesus said, “Leave her alone, so that she may keep it for the day of my burial. 8 For the poor you always have with you, but you do not always have me.”

    They, Obama/Clinton et. al., know better than you how to spend your money and make full use of government force to make it happen.

    George Washington said it best:

    Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.

    Force is the only thing that government can do well and should be limited to certain narrowly defined functions (See Romans 13: 3-4) such as a police force to protect citizens from criminal aggression, armed forces to protect against external aggression and courts to arbitrate disputes among citizens. In other words the dispensing of justice not welfare or “social justice.” As we have seen the more a government gets into the business of dispensing social justice it abandons the administration of real justice as defined by God.
    God ordains the individual, the family and the church as His instrument for ministering and caring for the poor/needy. Nowhere is the government charged with that function.
    Government is not to favor one group of citizens over another.

    “You shall do no injustice in court. You shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in righteousness shall you judge your neighbor.” Leviticus 19:15

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: